How It Works
“OXXON VERIFY's conclusion, where reached, states that the figures within OXXON VERIFY's scope conform in all material respects to the checks OXXON VERIFY's registered rule pack performed -- a positive-grammar conclusion scoped to OXXON VERIFY alone, not to the document as a whole.”
Three rule families
OXXON VERIFY's conclusion rests on deterministic, evidence-backed checks against the model's own figures — never an assessment of commercial or market assumptions. Every finding traces to one of three rule families:
-
Family A
Source Tie
A claim's value must tie to its matched source value elsewhere in the model, within the tolerance implied by how precisely each is rendered.
-
Family B
Internal Arithmetic
A row explicitly labeled a total must equal the sum of its components in every column both appear in (footing); percentage cells in the same column must sum to 100 (percent-of-100).
-
Family C
Restatement Consistency
The same claim, expressed more than once within one document, must agree within rendering tolerance wherever it is restated.
Two reports, one verification
A single verification run produces two reports for two different readers.
| Executive Decision Report | Technical Verification Report | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience | Board, committee, client | Modeller, reviewer, auditor, QA |
| Purpose | The verification outcome and its business implication, for a reader deciding whether to proceed | The full technical basis for that outcome -- every rule executed, every finding, every piece of evidence |
| Depth | Executive summary, structural findings summary, conclusion | Full Management Action Register, per-module technical detail, evidence census, methodology & provenance appendix |
The Confidence Scorecard
Every OXXON VERIFY verification is assessed across five Confidence Scorecard dimensions: Coverage, Integrity, Traceability, Consistency, and Residual Uncertainty. These five dimensions are never combined into a single overall score, on this website or anywhere else — a model's structural soundness is not one number.
The one exception is Tie Rate — of what was judged, how much agreed — which is always shown paired with Verification Coverage — how much was actually judged — never alone. This pairing is the one "confidence headline" this website presents; it is a single already-computed, already-governed metric, not a synthesized score.
See both reports rendered from a real, already-verified model on the Reports page.