Builder & Reviewer Licence
Executive Summary
Key Takeaways
- ✓ The Builder & Reviewer Licence lets model-build boutiques and advisory firms deliver structural verification on the platform under their own name, combined with Oxxon's structural layer.
- ✓ Deliverables are co-branded, with the firm's own opinion clearly separated from the generated structural findings, never blended into a single undifferentiated voice.
- ✓ Licensed firms operate as isolated tenants; cross-tenant access to another firm's data is structurally absent rather than merely permission-checked.
- ✓ Full white-label delivery is not offered; the Oxxon verification page is mandatory on every deliverable issued under the licence.
- ✓ Pricing combines an annual platform fee with a per-verified-model metering charge, reconciled against the engine's own execution record rather than the firm's self-reporting.
Purpose¶
The Builder & Reviewer Licence is the one product in the suite that manufactures delivery capacity rather than consuming it. It licenses model-build boutiques and advisory firms to deliver structural verification on the Oxxon Advisors platform, co-branded and metered, with the licensed firm's own judgment layered visibly on top of the platform's deterministic structural facts.
Who It Is For¶
The customer base is model-build boutiques, who need independent verification of their own builds but cannot provide that independence themselves, and second-tier or regional advisory firms who want to differentiate their model review offering and serve the mid-market without building their own audit engine. The buyer is the firm's principal, funded from the firm's own quality-assurance cost of sale and differentiation spend.
Problems Solved¶
- Model-build boutiques cannot independently verify their own builds without compromising the independence that makes a verification credible.
- Second-tier and regional advisory firms want to offer structural verification as part of their service without the cost and time of building an audit engine of their own.
- Firms need a way to deliver verification at volume without every engagement consuming founder-level review hours on the Oxxon side.
- Clients reading a co-branded deliverable need to see clearly which part is the deterministic structural layer and which part is the licensed firm's own professional opinion.
Workflow¶
A licensed firm is onboarded as a hardened, isolated tenant on the platform, with its own storage partitioning and reviewer identities bound to named individuals at the firm. The firm runs engagements on its own clients through the same structural pipeline used across the rest of the suite. Deliverables render with a co-branded layer: the standard Oxxon structural findings, plus a separately authored and signed firm opinion section, kept typographically distinct so the seam between generated fact and firm judgment stays visible on the page. Engine execution is metered per verified model and reconciled against the platform's own execution ledger into a monthly statement.
Outputs¶
The deliverable is a firm-configured variant of the standard review, committee, or documentation deliverable families, carrying the firm's own co-branded layer on top of Oxxon's structural findings, plus a monthly metering statement and a usage view inside the delivery platform for the firm's own tracking. Every deliverable issued under the licence carries the mandatory Oxxon verification page.
Continue Reading¶
Related Products¶
- Financial Model Audit Engine (FMAE)
- Independent Structural Model Review
- Documentation & Handover Pack
- FMAE Product Overview
Related Comparisons¶
How OXXON tests thisRun a free structural check with FMAE
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Builder & Reviewer Licence?
A licence allowing model-build boutiques and advisory firms to deliver structural verification on the Oxxon Advisors platform under their own name, producing co-branded deliverables that combine Oxxon's structural layer with the firm's own opinion.
Who buys the Builder & Reviewer Licence?
Model-build boutiques, who cannot independently verify their own builds without compromising independence, and second-tier or regional advisory firms wanting to offer structural verification without building their own audit engine.
Is this a white-label product?
No. White-label delivery is not offered. The Oxxon verification page is mandatory on every deliverable issued under the licence, so the platform's own structural layer is always visible.
How is a licensed firm's data kept separate from other firms on the platform?
Each licensed firm operates in an isolated tenant with its own storage partitioning; cross-tenant access paths are structurally absent rather than merely blocked by a permission check.
What does a co-branded deliverable actually look like?
It carries the standard Oxxon structural findings alongside a separately authored and signed firm opinion section, with the two kept typographically distinct so the reader can see clearly which part is generated fact and which part is the firm's own judgment.
How is a licensed firm billed?
An annual platform licence fee, plus a metering charge per verified model, reconciled monthly against the engine's own execution ledger rather than relying on the firm to self-report usage.
Can a licensed firm build its own rule packs on the platform?
No. Pack authoring by licensed firms and any programmatic API surface are both outside the current scope of the licence.
Why is this product sequenced early despite not being the largest revenue line?
It is the only product in the suite that manufactures delivery capacity rather than consuming it, which is prioritised ahead of pure revenue size under the firm's founder-capacity principle.
Related Articles
What Is a Financial Model Audit?
A financial model audit is an independent, structured examination of an Excel based financial model to confirm that its mechanics, logic, and outputs are reliable enough to support a decision. It is not a check of whether the assumptions are optimistic or conservative. It is a check of whether the model actually calculates what its author believes it calculates. Every year, lenders extend debt, investment committees approve capital, and boards sign off on transactions using numbers that came out of a spreadsheet nobody outside the immediate deal team has independently verified. A financial model audit exists to close that gap before it becomes expensive.
What Is Financial Model Governance?
Financial model governance is the set of policies, roles, and controls an organisation puts in place to manage the risk that comes from relying on financial models for material decisions. It is the organisational layer that sits above any individual financial model audit: governance determines when a model gets audited, who owns that decision, how versions are tracked, and what happens to findings once they exist. Most published governance content online is written for large, tier one banks operating under formal regulatory regimes. A private equity firm, a family office, or a mid market corporate finance team rarely has that scale of infrastructure, and does not need it, but still carries real exposure if no governance exists at all. This page defines governance at the level that actually applies to most organisations relying on Excel models, not just the largest ones.
Deterministic Audit vs Generative AI Review
Not all AI applied to financial model audit works the same way. This page compares two genuinely different approaches: deterministic audit, a fixed, rule based methodology applied consistently to every formula, and generative AI review, a general purpose large language model reading a model and offering commentary. Both use AI in a loose sense. Only one produces the repeatable, explainable, evidence backed output typically required for a material financial decision.